







Process Used to Develop the
Comprehensive Plan............................................ 1
The Comprehensive Plan and the
LWRP........................................................... 2
What is a Comprehensive Plan?......................................................................... 3
Population.......................................................................................................... 6
Households......................................................................................................... 8
Age................................................................................................................... 10
Educational Attainment..................................................................................... 11
Issues, Opportunities, and
Challenges............................................................. 12
Existing Land Uses........................................................................................... 13
Land Development Patterns............................................................................. 13
Map
1: Sub-Area Boundaries.............................................. following
page 13
Map 2:
Land Use Patterns.................................................. following
page 13
Hudson River Road Sub-Area.......................................................................... 14
Middletown/Fonda
Roads Sub-Area................................................................. 15
Upper Mohawk/North Waterford
Flight Sub-Area.............................................. 16
Lower Mohawk/South Waterford
Flight Sub-Area............................................. 17
Sugarloaf Pond/Saratoga Avenue
Sub-Area.................................................... 18
Five Islands Sub-Area...................................................................................... 22
Northern Village Sub-Area................................................................................ 23
Broad Street Commercial Sub-Area.................................................................. 24
Battery Sub-Area.............................................................................................. 27
Town of Waterford Zoning
Ordinance............................................................... 28
Map
3: Town of Waterford Zoning...................................... following
page 29
Map 4:
Village of Waterford Zoning.................................... following
page 35
Village of Waterford Zoning Ordinance
............................................................ 35
Issues, Opportunities, and
Challenges............................................................. 38
Regional Economic Context.............................................................................. 40
Map
5: Regional Setting...................................................... following
page 40
Labor Force Characteristics............................................................................. 41
Income Levels................................................................................................... 44
Economic Trends in Waterford......................................................................... 46
Recent Local and Regional Economic
Development Initiatives......................... 47
Issues, Opportunities, and
Challenges............................................................. 52
Historical Background....................................................................................... 54
Historic Architecture in
Waterford..................................................................... 60
National Register of Historic
Places Listings..................................................... 61
Map
6: Historic Resources.................................................. following
page 61
Properties Eligible for the
National Register..................................................... 65
Sites and Buildings of Possible
Significance..................................................... 66
Local Programs and Ordinances
Related to Historic Preservation................... 67
Issues, Opportunities, and
Challenges............................................................. 71
Topography...................................................................................................... 73
Steep Slopes.................................................................................................... 74
Map
7: Slopes..................................................................... following
page 74
Soil Types......................................................................................................... 74
Map 8:
Soils........................................................................ following
page 74
Wildlife and Fish Species.................................................................................. 75
Water Resources and Wetlands....................................................................... 74
Map
9: Wetlands................................................................. following
page 76
Floodplain......................................................................................................... 77
Map
10: Floodplains........................................................... following
page 77
Hazardous Waste Sites and
Regulated Substances......................................... 78
Issues, Opportunities, and
Challenges............................................................. 79
General Housing Characteristics...................................................................... 80
Recent Housing Development.......................................................................... 83
Map
11: Subdivisions.......................................................... following
page 83
Assisted Housing Programs.............................................................................. 84
Housing Market Conditions............................................................................... 85
Issues, Opportunities, and
Challenges............................................................. 86
Municipal Resources........................................................................................ 88
Map
12: Public Access Lands............................................. following
page 88
Parks on State-Owned Lands........................................................................... 89
The Waterford Flight........................................................................................ 90
Trails................................................................................................................ 91
Map
13: Trails Map............................................................. following
page 91
Other Recreational Resources......................................................................... 91
Issues, Opportunities, and
Challenges............................................................. 92
Sewer System................................................................................................... 93
Map
14: Sewers.................................................................. following
page 93
Water System................................................................................................... 93
Solid Waste Disposal........................................................................................ 94
Roadways......................................................................................................... 95
Map
15................................................................................. following
page 95
Travel Behavior................................................................................................ 97
Other Modes of Transportation........................................................................ 97
Issues, Opportunities, and
Challenges............................................................. 98
Governmental Structure................................................................................... 99
Fiscal Trends.................................................................................................. 100
Property Tax Base......................................................................................... .101
Public Safety..................................................................................................
103
Educational Services...................................................................................... 105
Issues, Opportunities, and
Challenges........................................................... 106
|
Comprehensive Plan (a.k.a. Master Plan) A comprehensive plan consists of the materials,
written and/or graphic, including but not limited to maps, charts, studies,
resolutions, reports, and other descriptive material that identify the goals,
objectives, principles, guidelines, policies, standards, devices and
instruments for the immediate and long-range protection, enhancement, growth
and development of a municipality. Chapter 418 of the Laws of 1995 amending General City
Law §28-a, Town Law §272-a, Village Law §7-722, and General Municipal Law
§119-u. |
This
document represents the results of research and interviews conducted to date to
develop an updated Comprehensive Plan for the Town and Village of
Waterford. The report describes existing
conditions, assesses community resources, identifies needs, and discusses key
issues, opportunities and challenges impacting the two communities at this
time. The draft Existing Conditions
Report provides a comprehensive source of information to assist in obtaining an
adequate understanding of the Town and the Village, their residents, and their
resources. It is designed to serve as a
basis for developing community goals, objectives, strategies, and policies in
future sections of the Comprehensive Plan.
The
draft Existing Conditions Report is organized into nine main sections. Components include demographic characteristics,
land use and zoning, the local economy, historic resources, environmental and
natural resources, housing, recreational resources, infrastructure and
transportation, and local government administration.
An
advisory committee was established in November 1999 to oversee the preparation
of the Comprehensive Plan and a Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (see
below). The ten-member committee was
appointed by Town Supervisor John E. Lawler and by Village Mayor J. Bert Mahoney,
and includes Philip Brendese, Village Planning Board Chairman Christopher
Callaghan, Daniel Cerone, Wayne Clermont, Town Planning Director Richard Hurst,
Laurie Marble, Anne Marie Morrissey, Ward Patton, Barbara Plummer, and Village
Zoning Board Chairman Kenneth Smith. The
supervisor and the mayor are ex-officio members. The role of the committee is to guide and
lead the planning process, communicate with municipal leaders, and help
facilitate community involvement in the development of the plans.
A key
goal of the Town and Village with regard to the Comprehensive Plan is to update
Waterford’s thirty-five year-old master plan, and to provide an opportunity for
residents to become actively involved in shaping Waterford’s future through
participation in the planning process.
Specific objectives expressed by individual committee members in
drafting the Comprehensive Plan include revitalizing the downtown commercial
district, addressing neighborhood concerns, using the waterfront as an asset,
protecting open space, preserving historic resources, building community pride,
and identifying concrete goals and action items for the Town and Village to
pursue.
|
The Hudson River Valley
Greenway The Hudson River Valley
Greenway is a program of voluntary regional cooperation in thirteen counties
bordering the Hudson River from Waterford in Saratoga County to Battery Park
in Manhattan. Authorized by the NYS
Legislature in 1991, the Greenway supports local and regional planning
efforts that address natural and cultural resource protection; economic development,
including tourism, agriculture, and the redevelopment of urban areas and
commercial waterfronts; public access; regional planning; and heritage and
environmental education. Greenway
programs are administered by the Hudson River Valley Greenway Communities
Council and the Greenway Conservancy for the Hudson Valley. Since the passage of the
Greenway Act, the Conservancy has designated model communities in each of its
riverfront counties. Waterford was designated as Saratoga County's community,
and has received funding assistance from the Greenway for the development of
the comprehensive plan. |
With
financial assistance from the Hudson River Valley Greenway Communities Council
(see box), the Town and Village have jointly hired a consultant, River Street
Planning & Development, to prepare the plans, working closely with the
advisory committee. The committee has
been meeting approximately once a month to plan and publicize the public
participation process, review research and findings prepared by the consultant,
and discuss critical issues.
To
ensure active public input and support, a resident survey was conducted in
January 2000. Designed to assess
residents’ opinions about various issues affecting the future of the Town and
Village, the survey was mailed to more than 3,000 households in Waterford and
distributed at various public places within the Town and Village. Nearly 300 residents responded to the survey,
and their input will be incorporated in many sections of the Comprehensive
Plan. (Summarized results of the survey
will be added to this document when they are finalized.)
In
addition, the Town and Village of Waterford and their project consultant hosted
a public “visioning session” at the Waterford Civic Center in March 2000 to
introduce residents to the planning process and present initial results of the
survey. More importantly, Waterford
residents participated in a brainstorming exercise designed to identify what
they appreciate about their community, what they would like to change, and what
Waterford will be like when the changes have been made. Comments provided by the nearly 100 residents
present at the session will be used in the future to develop a vision statement
and a series of goals for the Comprehensive Plan.
Several
public meetings will be held this year to provide additional opportunities for
the participation and involvement of Waterford residents. The consultant has also conducted interviews
with a variety of municipal staff, business leaders and other community stakeholders
to solicit input on various topics and identify specific concerns. Once completed, draft documents will be made
available for public review and comment.
A final Comprehensive Plan document is expected to be submitted to the
Town and Village Boards for adoption by the end of the year.
It should be noted that the Town
and Village are developing a local waterfront revitalization plan, or LWRP,
concurrently with the development of the Comprehensive Plan. Although there is a coordinated planning
process, with a joint advisory committee, each plan is being prepared as a
stand-alone document. This is largely
due to the fact that the elements of the LWRP are mandated by the state, and
focus primarily on the waterfront, while the Comprehensive Plan has a broader
perspective within a set of basic parameters.
The Local Waterfront Revitalization Program is a comprehensive program
administered by the Division of Coastal Resources of the New York State
Department of State that refines legislatively established waterfront policies
by incorporating local circumstances and objectives. Legislative authorization for the state
program is in New York State Executive Law, Article 42, “Waterfront
Revitalization of Coastal Areas and Inland Waterways.” These laws articulate the state’s policies
regarding its coastal areas and inland waterways.
The
LWRP brings together local and state governments, commerce and industry,
environmental interests, private organizations, and community citizens to
assess current opportunities and constraints and build consensus on the desired
future of the community’s waterfront.
More importantly, the LWRP provides a strategy for achieving that vision
and managing local resources. One of the
primary goals of the LWRP is to achieve a balance between economic development
and environmental protection that permits the beneficial use of waterfront
resources, while preventing the loss of valuable resources and public access
opportunities on the waterfront.
There
are several areas of overlap between the draft Existing Conditions Report
prepared as part of the Comprehensive Plan and the Inventory and Analysis which
represents the first major section of the LWRP.
These are mainly with regard to natural and historic resources, land
uses, and recreation. Efforts have been
made to establish consistency between the two plans where narrative sections
overlap, while meeting the objectives and requirements of both documents.
As
defined in the state legislation, a comprehensive plan is a document which
presents goals, objectives, guidelines, and policies for the immediate and
long-range protection, enhancement, growth, and development of a
community. Also known as a master plan
or land use plan, a comprehensive plan sets forth a community’s goals and
recommended actions or policies which will make the community a good place to
live, work, and visit. The plan outlines
what needs to be done and how to do it in order to ensure that the community
grows in an orderly, well-thought-out fashion and that the needs of the
community will be met.
A
comprehensive plan is not a static blueprint of how to get to some specific
end-point. It is a living document that provides continual guidance for
the work of the community’s leaders and staff.
Municipal decisions need to be weighed against the values and ideas set
forth in the overall plan to ensure that the community is headed in the right
direction.
There
is no set formula for the content of a comprehensive plan, but the state
statute suggests such elements as goal statements, strategies for improving the
local economy, and the consideration of population trends, regional needs,
agricultural uses, historic and natural resources, transportation facilities,
infrastructure, housing resources and needs, recreational facilities, and the
plans of other agencies and communities.
The contents of a comprehensive plan vary considerably and depend on the
identified priorities and needs of individual communities. Some municipalities focus primarily on land
use and zoning issues, others on economic development, infrastructure, or other
issues.
While
it is strongly recommended, New York State does not require communities
to have a comprehensive plan. However, there
are many reasons why a comprehensive plan is important. Among the benefits of having an updated
comprehensive plan are to establish consensus about the community’s future, to prepare for future demographic and economic
changes, to preserve community character, to protect natural and historic
resources, and to provide direction to other government agencies. Having a comprehensive plan in place can help
a community secure funding to assist with projects identified in the plan as important
to the community’s future.
The
comprehensive plan also serves as a legal basis for local land use regulations;
according to New York State law, zoning and other land use regulations must be
in accordance with a comprehensive plan.
The plan in itself is not a regulation, however. A plan states where you have been, what you
are like, and where you are going; ordinances, regulations, or local laws,
along with a variety of non-regulatory tools, are the tools used for getting
there.

The Town and Village of
Waterford are located in the southeastern corner of Saratoga County in the
Albany-Schenectady-Troy Metropolitan Statistical Area. The Town of Waterford encompasses
approximately 6.6 square miles and has a total population of 8,695. The Village
of Waterford, one of the oldest incorporated villages in the United States,
occupies 0.3 square miles in the southeastern portion of the Town. With approximately 2,500 residents in 1990, the
Village accounts for about 30% of the Town’s overall population but less than
5% of its land area.
The
Town and Village of Waterford are positioned at the convergence of the Hudson
River, the Mohawk River, and the New York State Barge Canal. The Town of Waterford is bordered by the Town
of Halfmoon to the north and west. The
Town of Schaghticoke and the City of Troy in Rensselaer County lie directly to
the east, across the Hudson River, while the City of Cohoes and the Town of
Colonie in Albany County are located on the opposite side of the Mohawk River,
south and west of the Town.
To
allow for an accurate analysis of demographic trends in the Town and Village of
Waterford, this section breaks out data separately for the Town of Waterford excluding
the Village, and the Village of Waterford.
These areas correspond to census tracts 627 and 628, respectively. Unless otherwise noted, data on the Town of
Waterford refers to areas of the Town outside the Village
boundaries.
When
the last decennial census was taken in 1990, the Town’s population was 6,203
and the Village had 2,492 residents. To
update population data between the years of the decennial census, the Bureau of
the Census produces population estimates for municipalities based on births,
deaths, tax returns, and other records.
The most recent estimates available from the Census Bureau indicate a
population of 6,930 residents in the Town and 2,241 residents in the Village in
1998[1].
As
shown in Table 1, the Town of Waterford has experienced steady growth over the
last several decades, with the most dramatic increase in population occurring
during the 1980s, a time when many new housing units were developed in the
Town. Between 1960 and 1990, the Town
experienced a cumulative 43.7% increase in population. Figures from the Capital District Regional
Planning Commission (CDRPC) indicate that population growth in the Town from
2000 through the year 2020 is likely to be moderate, with an increase of about
7% over the next twenty years.
In
contrast, the Village of Waterford has lost population in recent decades,
declining 14.5% between 1960 and 1990.
Similar to other small communities in New York, the Village has had a
relatively stable or declining population base, with little potential for
significant growth. Projections from
CDRPC indicate only marginal change in the size of the Village population
relative to that of the Town. By 2020,
the Village is expected to have about 2,360 residents, comprising 25% of the
Town’s population, compared to 40.3% in 1960.
|
Table 1: Population
Change - Town and Village of Waterford |
||||
|
Year |
Population |
Ten-Year Change |
Cumulative Change |
As Percent of County Population |
|
1960 (Town
Outside Village) 1960 (Village) |
4,316 2,915 |
|
|
4.8% 3.3% |
|
1970 (Town
Outside Village) 1970 (Village) |
4,680 2,879 |
8.4% -1.2% |
8.4% -1.2% |
3.9% 2.4% |
|
1980 (Town
Outside Village) 1980 (Village) |
4,789 2,405 |
2.3% -16.5% |
11.0% -17.5% |
3.1% 1.6% |
|
1990 (Town
Outside Village) 1990 (Village) |
6,203 2,492 |
29.5% 3.6% |
43.7% -14.5% |
3.4% 1.4% |
|
2000* (Town
Outside Village) 2000* (Village) |
6,602 2,376 |
6.4% -4.9% |
53.0% -18.5% |
3.3% 1.2% |
|
2010* (Town
Outside Village) 2010* (Village) |
6,901 2,363 |
4.5% -0.5% |
59.9% -18.9% |
3.2% 1.1% |
|
2020* (Town
Outside Village) 2020* (Village) |
7,040 2,358 |
2.0% -0.2% |
63.1% -19.1% |
3.2% 1.2% |
Source: Bureau of the Census, except (*), updated
population projections from the Capital District Regional Planning Commission.
Table
2 compares overall population change in the Town of Waterford (including the
Village) with that of Saratoga County, as a whole and neighboring
municipalities, between 1980 and 1990.
According to 1990 figures, the Town is growing at a faster rate than the
County and at a much faster rate than the state. Compared to surrounding communities, Waterford’s
rate of population growth is higher than the Towns of Halfmoon or
Schaghticoke. The Cities of Troy and
Cohoes both lost population during the 1980s.
|
Table 2: Comparative Population Change, 1980 – 1990 |
|
|
New York State |
2.5% |
|
Saratoga County |
17.9% |
|
Town of Halfmoon |
17.0% |
|
Town of Schaghticoke
(Rensselaer Co.) |
6.5% |
|
Town of Waterford (including
Village) |
20.9% |
|
City of Troy (Rensselaer Co.) |
-4.2% |
|
City of Cohoes (Albany Co.) |
- 7.3% |
|
Source: Bureau of the Census. |
|
A change
in the number of households can have a significant impact on the overall demand
for housing in a community and the type of housing desired. As defined by the
Census Bureau, a household includes all persons who occupy a housing unit; the
occupants may be a single family, one person living alone, two or more persons
living together, or any other group of related or unrelated individuals who
share living arrangements outside of an institution.
In
1990, there were 2,361 households in the Town of Waterford and 1,028 in the
Village. This represents increases of
45.9% in the Town and 7.8% in the Village compared to 1980 (Table 3). To some extent, the increase in the number of
households correlates with the increased population count and the rate of
housing growth in the Town outside the Village.
At the
same time, the average number of persons per household in the Town and Village
of Waterford has declined, paralleling trends nationwide. In general, the decrease in household size
over the last several decades is attributable to three factors: lower birth
rates, with fewer children per family; a concurrent increase in single parent
families; and a greater number of single-person households. Projections from the Capital District
Regional Planning Commission indicate that the number of households in the Town
and Village of Waterford will increase somewhat over the next twenty years,
while the decline in the average household size will begin to level off.
|
Table 3: Household
Projections - Town and Village of Waterford |
|||
|
Year |
Number of Households |
Ten-Year Change |
Persons Per Household |
|
1980 (Town, No
Village) 1980 (Village) |
1,618 954 |
|
2.94 2.50 |
|
1990 (Town, No
Village) 1990 (Village) |
2,361 1,028 |
45.9% 7.8% |
2.61 2.36 |
|
2000* (Town,
No Village) 2000* (Village) |
2,557 1,025 |
8.3% -0.3% |
2.49 2.30 |
|
2010* (Town,
No Village) 2010*
(Village) |
2,729 1,037 |
6.7% 1.2% |
2.44 2.26 |
|
2020* (Town,
No Village) 2020*
(Village) |
2,809 1,042 |
2.9% 0.5% |
2.42 2.24 |
Source: Bureau of the Census, except (*), updated projections
from the Capital District Regional Planning Commission.
Table
4 shows the distribution of households by type in each respective area. Within the Town, 61.4% of households could be
considered “traditional” nuclear families with a husband, wife, and related
children under the age of 18, while 14.4% were headed by a single parent. In the Village, 50.3% were traditional
nuclear family units, while 12.1% were headed by a single parent.
Consistent
with national trends, the composition of household types in both the Town and
Village has changed significantly since 1980, with a larger proportion of
single parent households and a smaller proportion comprised of married couple
families. This may have implications for
community services and employment opportunities related to child care in the
future. There has also been a moderate
increase in the number of non-family households, including single person
households and households of unrelated persons, such as roommates or domestic
partners.
|
Table 4: Households
by Type, 1980 - 1990, Town and Village of Waterford |
||||||
|
|
Town Outside Village |
Village |
||||
|
Type |
1980 |
1990 |
Change |
1980 |
1990 |
Change |
|
Married couple
families |
1,146 (70.8%) |
1,450 (61.4%) |
304 (26.5%) |
520 (54.5%) |
517 (50.3%) |
-3 |
|
Male headed
household, no wife |
36 |
106 |
70 (194.4%) |
25 |
29 |
4 |
|
Female headed
households, no husband |
119 |
233 |
114 (95.8%) |
103 (10.8%) |
96 |
-7 |
|
Non-family
households |
317 |
572 |
255 (80.4%) |
306 (32.1%) |
386 (37.6%) |
80 |
Source: Bureau of the Census.
Table
5A compares the age distribution of Waterford’s population in 1980 and
1990. The age structure of the
population can have important implications for the delivery of services within
the community, including education, recreation, and child care or elder care
programs.
|
Table 5A: Age
Distribution, 1980 - 1990, Town Outside Village and Village of Waterford |
||||||
|
|
Town Outside Village |
Village |
||||
|
Age Group |
1980 |
1990 |
Change |
1980 |
1990 |
Change |
|
0 - 4 Years |
280 (5.9%) |
493 (7.9%) |
76.1% |
186 (7.7%) |
169 (6.8%) |
-9.1% |
|
5 - 17 Years |
998 (20.8%) |
990 (16.0%) |
-0.8% |
430 (17.9%) |
478 (19.2%) |
11.1% |
|
18 – 24 Years |
603 (12.6%) |
570 (9.2%) |
-5.5% |
288 (12.0%) |
207 (8.3%) |
-28.1% |
|
25 – 44 Years |
1,159 (24.2%) |
2,251 (36.3%) |
94.2% |
623 (25.9%) |
828 (33.2%) |
32.9% |
|
45 – 64 Years |
1,241 (25.9%) |
1,181 (19.0%) |
-4.8% |
538 (22.4%) |
346 (13.9%) |
-35.7% |
|
65 Years and
Over |
508 (10.6%) |
718 (11.6%) |
41.3% |
340 (14.1%) |
464 (18.6%) |
36.5% |
Source: Bureau of the Census.
The
most recent census figures indicate that in 1990, 36.3% of Town residents and
33.2% of Village residents were between the ages of 25 and 44 – “baby boomers,”
born during the 1946-1964 period when birth rates in the United States soared
upward. These individuals are now
entering their peak earning years. The
school-age population (ages 5-17) represented 16.0% of the Town’s population
and 19.2% of the Village’s population.
Between
1980 and 1990, both the Town and the Village experienced significant increases
in the 25-44 category. The number of
elderly residents (65+) also increased.
In contrast, there was a decline in the young adult group (ages
18-24). The median age of the Town as a
whole increased from 32.5 years to 33.3 years during the 1980s. This is higher than Saratoga County (32.8)
but slightly below that of New York State (33.9).
Claritas,
Inc. is a private company which has been providing estimated and projected
demographic data for marketing and other uses for more than twenty years. At the national, state, and county levels,
the company develops population estimates based on the most recent estimates
produced by the Census Bureau.
Population growth is then projected using forecasts provided by WEFA, an
econometric forecasting firm[2]. At smaller geographic levels, a variety of
other sources, such as estimates from local agencies, household and consumer
marketing databases, and other proprietary sources, may also be used. The ability of Claritas to provide annual
demographic estimates and projections for small areas like towns and census
tracts makes it a valuable alternative when such information is not available
from government agencies.
|
Table 5B: Age
Distribution, 1990 - 1999, Town Outside Village and Village of Waterford |
||||||
|
|
Town Outside Village |
Village |
||||
|
Age Group |
1990 |
1999 |
Change |
1990 |
1999 |
Change |
|
0 - 4 Years |
493 (7.9%) |
518 (7.4%) |
5.1% |
169 (6.8%) |
145 (6.5%) |
-14.2% |
|
5 - 19 Years |
1,141 (18.4%) |
1,437 (20.5%) |
25.9% |
540 (21.7%) |
451 (20.3%) |
-16.5% |
|
20 – 24 Years |
419 (6.8%) |
356 (5.1%) |
-15.0% |
145 (5.8%) |
123 (5.5%) |
-15.2% |
|
25 – 44 Years |
2,251 (36.3%) |
2,294 (32.7%) |
1.9% |
828 (33.2%) |
700 (31.5%) |
-15.5% |
|
45 – 64 Years |
1,181 (19.0%) |
1,419 (20.2%) |
20.2% |
346 (13.9%) |
431 (19.4%) |
24.6% |
|
65 Years and
Over |
718 (11.6%) |
999 (14.2%) |
39.1% |
464 (18.6%) |
374 (16.8%) |
-19.4% |
Source: Bureau of the Census (1990) and Claritas,
Inc. (1999 estimates). Note that the age
categories used in this table differ somewhat from those used in Table 5A;
Claritas does not use the same age groups.
Claritas
estimates for 1999 indicate some recent shifts in Waterford’s population
according to age. In the Town outside
the Village, the number of residents in the 5-19, 45-64, and 65 and over age
groups increased considerably, while the 20-24 group decreased 15.0% between
1990 and 1999. In the Village, the only
age group to increase in size was the 45-64 category, most likely due to the
continued aging of the baby boom category.
The
decennial census provides information regarding the educational attainment of
persons 25 years of age and older.
According to the 1990 Census, approximately 80% of all Waterford
residents have attained at least a high school diploma (Table 6). However, they are less likely to have
continued their education beyond high school compared to Saratoga County
residents as a whole: in 1990, 13.5% of Town residents and 11.3% of Village
residents, compared to 25.2% of County residents, had earned a bachelor’s
degree or higher.
|
Table 6:
Educational Attainment of Individuals Aged 25+, Town and Village of
Waterford and Saratoga County, 1990 |
|||
|
Attainment Level |
Town Outside Village |
Village |
Saratoga County |
|
Less than high
school diploma |
19.0% |
23.0% |
17.0% |
|
High school
diploma or higher |
81.0% |
77.0% |
83.0% |
|
Bachelor's
degree or higher |
13.5% |
11.3% |
25.2% |
Source: Bureau of the Census.
Opportunities
·
The shifting of the population to the
Town outside the Village may require additional amenities and services in
outlying areas of the Town.
Challenges
·
The population growth in the Town
outside the Village over the last 30 years could be a significant issue for the
future. The extent to which the Town’s
population continues to grow may depend on the rate of housing growth in the
Town.
·
The declining Village population has
contributed to absentee landlords and decreased patronage of downtown
businesses.
·
As in many other communities, the
increased proportion of “non-traditional” family types (e.g., single parent
households, single person households) may impact the types of community
services needed in Waterford.
·
The population of both the Town and
Village is aging. Additional senior
housing may be needed to accommodate elderly residents in Waterford.
According to the Town and
Village assessors, 42% of the land in the Town of Waterford outside of the
Village is assessed as residential property, including vacant properties. Twenty-eight percent of the land is in
commercial use (this includes community services); 30% is used for industrial
purposes and less than one percent is classified as being in agricultural
use. In the Village, 75% of the land is
assessed as residential, and 25% is in commercial use (again, including
community services).
The existing land uses for Town
and Village of Waterford are presented for nine distinct, but arbitrarily named
sub-areas. Specific sub-area boundaries
are shown on Map 1. Each of these
sub-areas exhibits unique land use patterns which are outlined below. General boundary descriptions and a
preliminary analysis of opportunities and constraints in the near-term and
long-term are included for each sub-area.
The
sub-areas in the Town of Waterford outside the Village include:
·
Hudson River Road Sub-Area;
·
Middletown/Fonda Roads Sub-Area;
·
Upper Mohawk/North Waterford Flight
Sub-Area;
·
Lower Mohawk/South Waterford Flight
Sub-Area;
·
Sugarloaf Pond/Saratoga Avenue
Sub-Area; and
·
Five Islands Sub-Area.
Sub-areas
in the Village of Waterford include:
·
Northern Village Sub-Area;
·
Broad Street Commercial Sub-Area; and
·
Battery Sub-Area.
It
should be noted that there is substantial overlap between the sub-areas used to
divide up the Town and Village for the Comprehensive Plan, and the sub-areas of
the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) waterfront revitalization
area. The overlap applies to the Hudson
River Road, Upper Mohawk/North Waterford Flight, Five Islands, Northern
Village, and Broad Street Commercial Sub-Areas.
The other sub-areas used in the Comprehensive Plan generally cover areas
outside or expanding beyond the waterfront revitalization area;
the Southern Village Sub-Area combines two smaller sub-areas (Battery and
Southern Village) used in the LWRP.
Land
uses are graphically shown on Map 2.
Hudson River Road Sub-Area
The
Hudson River Road Sub-Area is defined as the area generally bounded to the north
by the Town of Halfmoon, the Hudson River to the east, the Old Champlain Canal
to the west, and the Village of Waterford’s northern boundary to the
south. This sub-area contains the
predominantly industrial and manufacturing uses in this area of the Town of
Waterford, as well as the 100- and 500-year flood hazard zones.
The
northern half of Hudson River Road, particularly on the west side, is primarily
made up of manufacturing, warehousing, and industrial uses. The GE Silicones facilities occupy a significant
portion of the northwestern side and part of the northeastern side of Hudson
River Road. Maximum Security and the
DeGussa Corporation are located on School House Road running east/west across
the northern end of Hudson River Road.
South of GE Silicones is the Golub Corporation Frozen Food Warehouse
(the former Grand Union site) at the northwest corner of Bells Lane and Hudson
River Road. On the eastern side of
Hudson River Road is a mix of residential properties and properties owned by
GE. Nine businesses, predominantly
industrial or manufacturing establishments, are located on Industry Drive which
crosses Hudson River Road south of Higgins Road.
Although
Hudson River Road has a concentration of industry, there are pockets of retail
commercial and residential uses. For
instance, there are four single family houses on large lots across from the
main GE facility. The houses are nicely
buffered by a row of mature pine trees.
Between
Bells and Higgins Road, there are approximately six single family homes on the
east side of Hudson River Road. South of
Higgins Road, Hudson River Road has a mix of commercial and residential
uses. Single family homes and some
multi-unit structures dot both sides of the road, many with little setback or
tree buffers, varying in size, lot size, and condition. South of Industry Drive, the land on Hudson
River Road becomes predominantly residential with the density increasing as one
approaches the Village.
There
are several commercial uses between Higgins Road and Industry Drive on Hudson
River Road, including automotive repair shops, convenience stores/gas stations,
a motel, and others.
Pockets
of open space or undeveloped land exist in this sub-area, particularly on the
eastern side of Hudson River Road. There
are also snowmobile trails along the northern boundary of the Town on School
House Lane; however, these lands are owned by the City of Mechanicville.
Opportunities
·
This sub-area provides an opportunity
for the creation of additional employment through industrial expansion.
Constraints
·
The predominance of industrial uses in
this sub-area may preclude the development of other land uses such as
residential and recreational.
Middletown/Fonda Roads Sub-Area
The
Middletown/Fonda Roads Sub-Area is located in the Town of Waterford and is generally
bounded to the north by the Town of Halfmoon, to the east by the old Champlain
Canal, to the west by the Mohawk River, and to the south by the Erie Canal and
the Village of Waterford boundary.
The
sub-area is dominated by residential land uses and is the primary location of
the Town’s subdivisions. The only
non-residential uses include St. Joseph’s Cemetery on Middletown Road on the
west side just north of the Village line, St. Mary’s Cemetery on the east side
of Middletown Road north of the Prospect Hill subdivision, St. Peter’s and St.
Paul’s Cemetery just south of St. Mary’s, and St. Michael’s Cemetery adjacent
to Swayze Acres on the east side of Middletown Road. Next to St. Michael’s Cemetery is the
Waterford Halfmoon Central School campus which is one building, the Friends
Park Playground, several recreational fields and Waterford United Methodist
Church. There are also recreational
fields on the west side of Middletown Road operated by the Town of Waterford. The only commercial uses in this sub-area are
at the town line where Middletown and Fonda Roads converge.
Middletown
Road
The
patterns of residential development in this sub-area appear to have been
dictated by topography and the location of water and sewer lines. The topography includes a variety of steep
slopes and small plateaus where development is located. The majority of the housing is single family
with a variety of sizes, ages, conditions, and lot sizes.
Several
subdivisions have been constructed along the plateau of Middletown Road
including Hillview Terrace, just north of the Village line, and Prospect
Hill. Both were built c. 1950. Swayze Acres is a development on the north
side of Middletown Road built after 1950 with homes added through the 1960s and
1970s. The homes are of mixed size on
small, well-treed lots. On the opposite
side of Middletown Road, along Robin Lane and adjacent streets, is Elayne
Meadows. Homes in this area were
constructed in the mid-1960s and are surrounded by mature trees and plantings.
Heading
west on Middletown Road there is a small development on the west side of the
school campus. Highland Hills North, a
development of large single family homes built in the late 1970s, is also on
the north side of Middletown Road. On
the opposite side of Middletown Road is Devitt Road South which is a mature
subdivision of smaller homes on smaller lots.
Just west is Suncrest Estates which was built in the 1980s and is
nestled between Middletown Road and Fonda Road. The homes are large, and many
were custom built, with large, landscaped lots and a designated greenspace
park. The Birch Glen development,
constructed in the 1990s, is located on the north side of Middletown Road just before
it intersects with Fonda Road. Large
custom homes on large lots are mixed with pockets of mature trees and newly
landscaped areas with saplings. Birch
Glen also includes some duplexes and apartment buildings. Another recent housing development near the
intersection of Middletown and Fonda Roads is Copperfield, which consists
entirely of single family homes.
Fonda
Road
Fonda
Road has single family homes on both sides with additional housing developments
concentrated at its western end. There
is a treed enclave of single family homes on Ferguson Street and Cappabianca on
the south side of Fonda Road with a mix of new and older homes of varying sizes
and lots. Heading east is a large
development called Riverbend which began construction in the 1980s and
continues to be phased in today with many lots still available. The housing is a mix of large single family
homes, townhouses, and apartments; some are built into hillsides, others on
small plateaus leading to steep drop-offs.
The development meanders south to the state boat launch (Alcathy’s
Marina). To the east are Strawberry
Ridge Apartments and Pine Park Apartments built in the 1980s. A mobile home park is situated off of Fonda
Road more than a mile east of Pine Park Apartments.
Opportunities
·
There may be some opportunities for small-scale,
in-fill development in this sub-area with changes to the zoning ordinance.
Constraints
·
Given the rapid development of this
sub-area, some land conservation districts may need to be considered to protect
open space or establish buffers.
·
Topography and soil conditions make
additional development in this sub-area difficult. Most areas of prime developable land, not
including lands used for recreational purposes, have already been built-out.
Upper Mohawk/North Waterford Flight Sub-Area
The narrow
Upper Mohawk/North Waterford Flight Sub-Area is defined by the arbitrary
parallel lines approximately 500 feet north of Waterford Flight Road’s center
line to the north, the Village’s western boundary to the east, and the
Waterford Flight to the south. The
sub-area contains the Mohawk River shoreline above Cohoes Falls and the
northern shoreline for the Waterford Flight.
This
sub-area is adjacent to the Waterford Flight which is an impressive set of five
lift locks along the Erie Division of the Barge Canal. Waterford Flight Road runs along the
canal. The sub-area begins west of Lock
3 of the Waterford Flight.
Between
Lock 4 and Lock 5 the land along Waterford Flight Road, which is owned by the
NYS Canal Corporation, is undeveloped.
Approximately six newer houses facing Fonda Road can be seen from
Waterford Flight Road near Lock 4. There
is an old power house at Lock 4 and Lock 5; however, a small, newer building
also exists at Lock 5. Heading north on
Waterford Flight Road past Lock 5, the east side of the road is also Canal
Corporation land. The land is owned by the NYS Canal Corporation as far west as
the area known as Alcathy’s Marina (now NYS Boat Launch), which has a boat
launching ramp, dock and picnicking facilities.
Opportunities
·
The construction of a proposed walking
trail along the Waterford Flight would enhance the recreation possibilities of
the Town and region.
·
There is potential for increased
recreational activity on land owned by the NYS Canal Corporation at Alcathy’s
Marina (NYS Boat Launch) if additional enhancements can be made.
Constraints
·
The Town has designated the canal
shoreline area a land conservation district.
However, additional protective measures such as waterfront design review
guidelines and screening or buffering requirements may be needed to maintain
the scenic quality of the Waterford Flight given the close proximity of
residential development off Fonda Road.
·
The terrain in this sub-area varies
greatly and is often steep-sloped and eroded, creating a potentially dangerous
landscape.
Lower Mohawk/South Waterford Flight Sub-Area
The
Lower Mohawk/South Waterford Flight Sub-Area is somewhat irregularly bounded
and includes three distinct sections.
The largest section of this sub-area generally includes all the land
situated between the Erie Canal and Mohawk River to the west of the Niagara
Mohawk power transmission line right-of-way.
The power transmission line runs generally northeastward from a point
below the Cohoes Falls to a point west of the boundaries of the Waterford Rural
Cemetery, then closely parallels the cemetery boundary to the Erie Canal. Mountainview Avenue parallels the power line
to the immediate east. The other two
sections of this sub-area are along the Erie Canal and Mohawk River shorelines,
with the boundary line extending inland and following an arbitrary line
paralleling the shoreline at a distance of approximately 500 feet.
This
sub-area has remained largely undeveloped throughout Waterford's history. For the most part, it consists of open space
in public and private ownership, with a number of small summer camps located
along the Mohawk River and Crescent Lake shorelines. The camps are generally located well north of
the Cohoes Falls where the rugged topography flattens out (roughly opposite
Fonda Road in the City of Cohoes). The
camps are linked by private roads.
The
Erie Canal shoreline is largely owned by New York State with land uses
consisting mainly of open space. The
Mohawk River shoreline is partially developed and is generally in residential use
in the areas west of Saratoga Avenue (along River, Grove, Grand and Clifton
Streets).
Opportunities
·
The undeveloped Mohawk River shoreline
provides scenic views of the Cohoes Falls and the Harmony Mills Industrial
Complex with opportunities for recreation and the interpretation of historic
and natural resources.
Constraints
·
Water access is constrained by the
extremely steep slopes along the Mohawk River and the Cohoes Falls.
·
Much of the waterfront land in this
sub-area is privately owned. Trail
development would require the acquisition of easements or property. Because of the special character of this
area, any future development of land in this sub-area should be done in
accordance with a well-thought out plan, with allowances for public access.
·
The prevalence of private ownership in
this sub-area may also restrict future development and public access.
Sugarloaf Pond/Saratoga Avenue Sub-Area
The Sugarloaf Pond/Saratoga
Avenue Sub-Area is generally bounded by the Barge Canal to the northeast, the
Niagara Mohawk power transmission line right-of-way to the northwest, and the
Mohawk River to the west and south. The
sub-area contains the Town's southern gateway and its link to Cohoes and other
points to the south. It includes the
Northside Historic District, Waterford Historical Museum, old Champlain Canal
and Canalway Trail, several thriving industries, a wide range of housing in
various conditions and styles, and two commercial areas. Dams in the Mohawk River prevent boater
access to this area.
A
portion of this sub-area lies within the Northside Historic District, which was
listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 1975 and includes
approximately 123 structures. The
overall character of this sub-area has always reflected its division by the D
& H Railroad right-of-way to the west of Saratoga Avenue, Saratoga Avenue
itself, the Champlain Canal (and canalway trail), and the Fourth Branch of the
Mohawk River. King's Power Canal, which
has nearly disappeared from the landscape, once ran parallel to the Mohawk
River, providing water power to a wide range of industries along the Fourth
Branch of the Mohawk River. The Erie
Canal, Champlain Canal and Fourth Branch of the Mohawk River actually make the
area currently occupied by Ursula of Switzerland, the Town Highway Department
and Water Pollution Control Facility, and Mohawk Paper an island. Although residential uses are most prevalent,
land uses in this sub-area are quite diverse and include residential, commercial,
recreational, industrial and public uses.
Generally
speaking, residential uses predominate along Saratoga Avenue, Museum Lane,
Fulton and Canal Streets, as well as the side streets to the west of Saratoga
Avenue. Between the Mohawk River and
Clifton Street/Museum Lane, a large, single-family house in excellent condition
occupies the east side of Saratoga Avenue; several two-family houses in poor to
fair condition are located on the west side.
Museum Lane is characterized by small, densely built houses in fair to
poor condition. Although most appear to
have been built in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, their architectural
and historical character has not been preserved. Museum Lane is heavily posted with signs
announcing "private property" and "keep out," and there is
very little indication that the Waterford Historical Museum and the southern
terminus of the Champlain Canalway Trail are located here.
From
Fulton Street to Hill and Canal Street on Saratoga Avenue, residential
buildings vary considerably in style, building materials and condition. Most are wood frame buildings in fair
condition. In addition, while most of
these residential buildings were originally large single family homes, many of
them have been subdivided into two- to four-unit apartments. There are approximately four large apartment
buildings. Fulton and Canal Street are
defined by small residential buildings on small lots. Most buildings appear to date to the early
nineteenth century, but their architectural character has been largely
obscured.
Residential
uses also predominate on the west side of Saratoga Avenue between Hill and Arch
Streets. Housing conditions, styles and
building materials again vary considerably.
Most houses are large one- and two-family frame buildings on fairly
large lots. The Town-owned Clement Park
is located at the end of Clifton Street and overlooks the Mohawk River and
Harmony Mills in Cohoes. Residential uses
in this sub-area are predominantly one- and two-family houses constructed during
the late 1800s and early 1900s and situated on small, narrow lots. Clifton Street Extension, which
is characterized by mid-sized single family detached houses on larger lots, is
the only exception to the otherwise high-density residential development
pattern.
The
most notable residential buildings, known as "Mill Owner's Row," are
located on Saratoga Avenue between Arch and Van Ness Streets. The west side of Saratoga Avenue, which is
located very close to the Champlain Canal in this area, is characterized by
large, historically and architecturally distinctive houses built on large
hillside lots. These handsome buildings
are generally in good to excellent condition; most other housing in this
sub-area consists of smaller wood frame single- and multi-family houses. Most buildings are in fair condition and
would benefit from rehabilitation.
Land
on the west side of Saratoga Avenue, near the Town-Village boundary, is in
public use and occupied by the Waterford Rural Cemetery. Land uses to the east of Saratoga Avenue
include residential, industrial and public uses. Three single family houses are located at
the top of Burton Avenue. The Champlain
Canal, Canalway Trail and Town Highway Department occupy most of the remaining
land. The New York State Office of
Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation has determined that this whole area
is archeologically sensitive.
A
small residential area known locally as "Dial City" surrounds the
former Ormsby-Laughlin Textile Mill (now Ursula of Switzerland) along Mohawk,
Short Sixth and South Streets. This
neighborhood is characterized by single-family houses on small lots which were
probably constructed during the mid-nineteenth century. For the most part, the architectural and
historical character of these buildings has been obscured by later additions
and alterations. The recently reopened
Fourth Street Bridge connects this area to the southern portion of Waterford
village.
Commercial
uses are concentrated at the southern end of this sub-area between the Mohawk
River and Fulton Street. They include a
grocery store, doll store, chiropractor's office, hardware store, McDonald's,
and a strip mall occupied by an auto supply store, hair salon, pasta and pizza
restaurant, insurance offices, aerobic training center, wine and liquor store,
Stewarts Shop, dollar store, and beverage outlet. Two automotive businesses are located along
Saratoga Avenue between Hill, Canal, and Arch Streets. Another commercial cluster exists on the west
side of Saratoga Avenue between Van Ness and Maple Streets. This cluster includes a bank, medical
building, and a clock repair and restoration shop.
Recreational
uses predominate on the east side of Saratoga Avenue and include Garrett Field
(to the south of Hutchinson Lane) and the Champlain Canalway Trail. This trail extends throughout the sub-area
paralleling Saratoga Avenue. Trailheads
are marked where the trail begins at the Waterford Historical Museum and
Cultural Center as well as in areas where the trail intersects with roadways
(Fulton Street, Hill Street, and Hutchinson Lane).
Industrial
uses dominate the area to the east of the Champlain Canal, reflecting historic
land use trends and the importance of water power. Industries include Ursula of Switzerland, a
clothing manufacturer located in the old Ormsby-Laughlin Textile Mill on Mohawk
Avenue and Mohawk Paper, which occupies and owns most of the land along the
Mohawk River. A storage building used by
Mohawk Paper is located on the north side of O'Connor Drive near the company’s
main entrance. To the east of Van Ness
Street, a considerable amount of formerly industrial land is vacant and
underutilized.
Public
uses are also abundant in this sub-area.
They include the F.B. Peck Hose Company, which occupies a new building
on the east side of Saratoga Avenue near Canal Street; the Waterford Emergency
Team, Inc., which is on Davis Place; the Town of Waterford Waste Water
Treatment Facility along Mohawk Avenue; and the Town Highway Department (just
off Hutchinson Lane). The Waterford
Historical Museum is hidden within a warren of small, densely built houses at
the end of Museum Lane. The other major
public use in this sub-area is the Waterford Rural Cemetery, which is located
along Maple Avenue and Saratoga Avenue.
Northwest
of the railroad tracks is a residential area that is more densely populated
near Saratoga Avenue, with larger lots and predominantly single family homes to
the northwest. The residences
surrounding Sugarloaf Pond Park were built after 1950 and are a mix of sizes,
while the homes off Catallo Drive are newer, larger and less concentrated. The residences in the area of
Mountainview Avenue, Garrett Drive, and
Valleyview Avenue northwest of Sugarloaf Pond are on smaller lots and are a mix
of new homes and homes built in the 1970s and 1980s.
Opportunities
·
The Cohoes-Waterford Bridge and
Saratoga Avenue represent Waterford's southern gateway. The improvement of this gateway would
significantly enhance resident and visitor perceptions of the Town and Village
and would encourage additional visitation and private investment. Such improvements could include bridge
repair; welcome, wayfinding, and interpretive signage; greenspace at the west
side of the bridge and similar improvements.
Except for the contemporary colonial revival house on the east side of
Saratoga Avenue and commercial development, this area currently presents a less
than favorable impression. Improvements
could be coordinated with redevelopment of the Star Textile Mills property
along the waterfront in Cohoes. Facade
and streetscape improvement along the length of Saratoga Avenue would vastly
improve this primary entrance into the Village.
·
Clement Park has great potential as a
starting point and interpretive area for a Cohoes Falls overlook trail. This location, which overlooks the historic
Harmony Mills complex (a National Historic Landmark) in Cohoes would allow for
public parking and easy access to the trail.
It would also be a good location for interpretive signage related to the
Cohoes Falls and Mohawk River, as well as the Harmony Mills complex and other
industries once powered by the Mohawk.
·
This sub-area is extremely rich in
historic, architectural and industrial archeology resources. Improvement and interpretation of historic properties
and resources, particularly along the existing Champlain Canalway Trail, would
significantly strengthen Waterford's efforts to become a tourism destination
and might encourage additional homeownership.
·
Development of the proposed "Inn
& Restaurant at the Point" would be a significant improvement in this
sub-area and be a positive addition to the waterfront. The Town and Village have secured
approximately $3 million in low-interest loan funding through the U.S.
Department of Housing & Urban Development’s Canal Corridor Initiative. A Request for Proposals was issued in 1998,
but no responses were received and the project is currently on hold pending
completion of other canal projects.
·
The Waterford Historical Museum is a
strong complement to the new Waterford Visitors Welcome Center. However, it is little known outside of
Waterford. Streetscape improvements and
better signage, maps and promotion efforts could improve the museum’s position
as a heritage tourism destination.
Constraints
·
Most of the land in this sub-area is
privately owned and actively used.
Changes in land use would therefore require acquisition of property or
easements.
·
This sub-area is cut off from boat
traffic because of dams in the various branches of the Mohawk River.
·
There are a number of traffic issues in
this sub-area: traffic speeds are
generally high despite posted limits, there are numerous side streets and curb
cuts, there is a high volume of truck traffic and sidewalks are very narrow or
nonexistent. The area is not
pedestrian-friendly.
·
The negative signage on Museum Lane,
narrow roadway and poor condition of houses along Museum Lane currently make
this street a poor entrance to the Waterford Historical Museum and Champlain
Canalway Trail.
·
Although recreational and historic
resources are plentiful in this sub-area, there is little indication that they
exist.
·
Many houses along Saratoga Avenue are
in poor or fair condition and have lost much of their historic integrity
through incompatible additions and generous application of twentieth century
siding materials.
Five Islands Sub-Area
The Five Islands Sub-Area is
generally bounded by the Hudson River and several branches of the Mohawk
River. It includes Peebles Island, the
largest and easternmost of the four islands, Second Island, Goat Island, and
Bock Island; all occupy significant places in Waterford's history.
Peebles
Island encompasses approximately 150 acres and is predominantly undeveloped
park land. The island is owned by the
New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP)
and is operated as Peebles Island State Park.
Although a bridge connected Peebles Island to the Village of Waterford
for many years, this bridge, which is known as the "North Bridge,"
has been closed for many years because of unsafe conditions (the bridge is
scheduled to be repaired and reopened in 2002).
As a result, the island is currently inaccessible from Waterford and the
rivers, but can be reached from Delaware Avenue which extends northward from Route
470 (Ontario Avenue) on Van Schaick Island.
This road terminates at the administrative offices of the NYS OPRHP as
well as park facilities at the northeast quadrant of the island. These offices occupy several buildings that
were once the Cluett Peabody Company Bleachery.
The park complex also includes several mounds, or earthen berms,
constructed as part of military defenses in the American Revolution. There are two parking areas, interpretive
signage, and trails encircling the island.
The
now-defunct Matton Shipyard, which is owned by the NYS OPRHP, is located on Van
Schaick Island (Cohoes) across the South Bridge. The shipyard site encompasses six acres and
is included in the Peebles Island interpretive program. The RiverSpark Urban Cultural Park Management
Plan indicates that OPRHP's plans call for demolition of the less noteworthy
buildings, building a marina at either the former boatyard or to the immediate
south; building a parking lot to the north that can also serve Peebles Island;
and, in time, providing an interpretive exhibit on shipbuilding. OPRHP's Historic Sites Bureau
photographically documented the shipyard in its last year of operation.
Opportunities
·
Peebles Island State Park has only been
minimally developed and interpreted. Additional
development and interpretation would make this currently underutilized park a
much more significant asset to the region.
Interpretive themes could relate to Native American history, early Dutch
and English settlement, the American Revolution, industrial archeology, and
water transportation. Rare and important floral species (such as lichens and
mosses) also exist in abundance.
·
There is interest in returning Matton
Shipyard to its original use as a tug boat restoration business.
·
The four small islands in the Fourth
Branch of the Mohawk River are extremely underutilized. While not suitable for most development, they
could be incorporated into park usage.
·
The scheduled repair and reopening of
North Bridge will significantly increase the flow of visitors from Peebles
Island to the Broad Street commercial area.
Constraints
·
The New York State Office of Parks,
Recreation and Historic Preservation has determined that all of Peebles Island
is archeologically sensitive. This
determination will result in some restrictions or constraints to any ground
disturbance or new development.
·
Current access to Peebles Island is
limited by the condition of the North Bridge, although the bridge is scheduled
to be repaired in the next few years.
Northern Village Sub-Area
The somewhat irregularly-shaped
Northern Village Sub-Area is generally bounded by the Village line to the
north, the Hudson River to the east, Division Street to the south (see Broad
Street Sub-Area), the Waterford Flight and the Village line to the east and
south, and portions of Eighth and Ninth Streets. The sub-area is roughly divided by U.S. Route
4/State Route 32 (which follows Third Street to the north), the Broad Street
commercial area, the old Champlain Canal, and the CSX railroad tracks. It is predominantly residential in character,
with commercial, public and institutional uses in the areas closest to the
Broad Street Sub-Area and recreational uses in the western portions of the
sub-area.
The
residential neighborhoods vary considerably in building size, material,
condition, style and historic integrity.
The neighborhoods of State, Columbia, Hudson, and Fourth Streets,
portions of which are included in the Waterford Village Historic District, are
characterized by small, well-maintained single-family detached houses with
considerable architectural character and style.
Similarly, Second and Third Streets in this sub-area are articulated by
small single family detached houses.
Many of these buildings are wood frame buildings dating to Waterford's
earliest years, but most have been severely altered through the application of
aluminum siding and other alterations. A
number of the larger structures have been divided into multi-family apartments. In the areas closest to Broad Street, most residential
buildings are large, well-maintained brick houses which contribute to the
Waterford Village Historic District. In
the neighborhood to the west of the Champlain Canal, building lots and houses
are larger and residential buildings are generally in fairly good
condition. Many of these buildings
appear to date to the mid-nineteenth century.
There are few commercial uses in this sub-area, and those that do exist,
such as Philip Brendese Funeral Home, and Patregnani and Morra Dentists, are
interspersed with residential buildings.
Public
uses in this sub-area include the Waterford Public Library in the former D
& H Freight Station (between Second and John Streets); the Waterford
Waterworks (Second Street), the Fourth Street Playground, and the New York
State Department of Transportation facility off Eighth Street (canal repair
shops). The D & H Railroad
right-of-way also passes through the western portion of the Village. St. Mary’s Hall is across the street from St.
Mary’s School on the northeast corner of Division and Sixth.
Opportunities
·
The ends of Sixth and Seventh Streets
are in public ownership and have potential for water-related development.
Constraints
·
There is very little, if any, vacant
land available for development in this sub-area.
·
Resources are needed to rehabilitate
the older housing stock in this sub-area and improve the overall appearance of
the neighborhood.
Broad Street Commercial Sub-Area
The Broad Street Commercial
Sub-Area is defined as the area bound by Division Street to the north, the
Hudson River to the east, Eighth Street to the west, and Middle Street the
south. The sub-area is designed to
contain the Village’s commercial district on Broad Street: a seven block
downtown commercial strip located in the Village of Waterford Historic
District. Broad Street is a two-way
street with parking on both sides, except along the block between Third and
Fourth Streets. There are traffic lights
at two intersections. The side streets
are a mix of one and two-way streets.
Most of the buildings are two and three stories and a mix of commercial,
residential and some public uses. Their
age and condition are also mixed and include some notable buildings on the
National Register of Historic Places including the Second Empire style Samuel
Smith House and Second Empire style Shyne House on First Street just north of
Broad Street.
Broad
Street
Geiger
Park or the Eighth Street Park anchors the sub-area to the west side of Eighth
Street. The park is a neighborhood park
with a playground, tennis and bocce courts.
There is a fire station on the east side of Eighth on Division
Street. Broad Street is anchored to the
east by two parks, the Hudson River, and Union Bridge which crosses the Hudson
into Lansingburgh. The two parks are
located on First Street on either side of the bridge. Knickerbocker Park is a greenspace with
benches for sitting along the Hudson River.
Soldiers and Sailors Memorial Park is landscaped with a sitting area and
a memorial marker to veterans.
Two
blocks east of Eighth Street at Broad and Sixth Street is Flatiron Park, a
landscaped, triangular greenspace. A
concrete bridge crossing the old Champlain Canal and a trailhead for the
canalway trail are to the north of Broad Street. This point on Broad Street
marks the western end of the commercial strip.
From
Eighth Street southeast to the river, Broad Street has a mix of commercial
businesses including two taverns, four eateries featuring Italian and Chinese
fare, a coffee shop and a café. There
are two gas stations; one with a mini-mart.
Other commercial uses include a funeral home, three antique shops, card
shop, sign making shop, florist, office products store, a copy center, bank,
and a laundromat, as well as service-related businesses such as hair and nail
styling, pet grooming, and a taxidermist.
Two law offices, an insurance office, a dentist, and a chiropractor have
offices on Broad Street. There are two
vacant, first floor commercial storefronts and several second story
vacancies. With the exception of the Key
Bank and gas stations, parking for these commercial businesses is on Broad
Street, side streets, alleys and a municipal parking lot with eight spaces
located on Broad between Second and Third Streets. The Town and Village Hall is located between
Fourth and Third Streets on Broad Street, as is the American Medical Career
Institute which occupies two three-story buildings joined by a new facade.
Second-story
residential uses for many of the properties along Broad Street are common and
two- and three-story multi-unit apartment buildings are common, with the
exception of Broad Street from Eighth Street to Sixth where several large,
single-family homes are located. In
fact, there are at least fourteen buildings with multiple residential units as
well as several single- and two-family homes.
There appears to be significant vacancy in the apartment buildings,
although none have “for sale” signs on them.
In fact, only one home along Broad Street indicates that it is for sale.
North
of Broad Street to Division Street
Between
Broad Street and the east side of Division Street there is a mix of uses
including commercial, residential, recreational, institutional and public. Residential uses are more concentrated from
the Eighth to Sixth Streets where there are a mix of very large single family
homes on Broad Street and smaller single or two-family homes between Broad and
Division Streets. Third to First Streets
has a mixture of larger single family homes on First and smaller single and
multi-family homes on Second, Third and Division Streets.
Commercial
uses dissipate north of Broad Street, although several businesses exist on
Fourth Street, including a side entrance to the Mobil Gas Station on Broad
Street, a car wash, and a barber. There
are law offices on Second Street at the corner of Division and a doctor’s
office and a deli on Third Street.
Recreational
facilities in this sub-area are in the form of the canal trail and neighborhood
parks. J. Geiger Park (Eighth Street
Park), located on the west side of Eighth Street where Division Street ends, is
owned by the Village of Waterford.
Fourth Street Park begins west of Fourth Street and heads north to
Columbia Street. The Old Champlain Canal Walking Trail cuts through this
sub-area between Fourth and Sixth Streets along the canal.
Public
uses are common between Broad and Division Streets. Village fire houses are located east of
Eighth Street on the south side of Division Street, on the north side of
Division between Third and Fourth Streets, and on Pearl Street between First
and Second. The United States Post
Office is located on the east side of Fourth Street at Division Street. The
Waterford Rescue Squad is located on Fourth Street and Division on the south
side of Division.
There
are two churches in this area including St. Mary of the Assumption Catholic
Church on Broad and Sixth Street and the First United Church on Third
Street. St. Mary’s School is located
next to St. Mary’s Church on the south side of Division Street.
South
of Broad Street to Middle Street
This
part of the Broad Street Commercial Sub-Area is almost entirely residential
with the exception of the Civic Center (a former Baptist church) and Grace
Episcopal Church on Third Street. The
residential blocks south of Broad Street are densely populated with a mix of
two-family and single family structures on Fifth, Fourth and Middle Streets and
more multi-family structures on Third through First Streets and Middle
Street. The structures are a mix of
styles and conditions.
Ninth
Street (Portion of Village on south side of the NYS (Erie) Canal)
Land
uses in this portion of the Village (between the Erie Canal and Northside) are
extremely diverse. The area is divided
into two sections by Ninth Street, which becomes Saratoga Avenue in the
Town. Land on the west side of Ninth
Street is in public use and occupied by the Waterford Rural Cemetery. Land uses to the east of Saratoga Avenue are
residential.
Opportunities
Constraints
·
Despite the large historic building
stock, buildings and facades on Broad Street are often in poor condition. Numbers on buildings are rare, and signage is
inconsistent. Other aesthetic deficiencies include a lack of trees; the present
use of cobra lights which illuminate the road, rather than the sidewalks; the
condition of sidewalks; and overhead wiring and telephone poles.
·
The traffic volume on Broad Street, particularly
truck traffic, is not pedestrian or customer friendly.
·
Alleys are frequent and wide.
·
A significant amount of the housing stock from
Middle to Broad Streets is in poor condition.
·
Division Street frontage is largely
made up of the backs of buildings and parking lots. Lining the street with trees or some other
beautification might improve the look of the street.
·
Investment by property owners in
this sub-area is discouraged by frequent flooding. Much of the housing stock is in fair to poor
condition.
Battery Sub-Area
The Battery Sub-Area is
generally bounded to the north by Middle Street, to the east by the Hudson
River, and to the south and west by the Barge Canal, and also includes a small
portion of the Village which is located southwest of the canal adjacent to the
Waterford Rural Cemetery.
This
sub-area represents the residential waterfront section of the Village,
historically connected to Peebles Island and Northside by the architecturally
significant Second (also known as Peebles Island or North Bridge) and Fourth
Street Bridges. The Second Street bridge
is expected to reopen for pedestrian use in 2002 following substantial repair
and the Fourth Street bridge was recently rehabilitated and returned to
service.
Although
this sub-area was historically characterized by diverse uses associated with
its working waterfront location, today it is dominated by small, wood-frame
single family houses, interspersed with two-family buildings. Houses along Front and Parker Street are
directly on the waterfront and are frequently subject to flooding. Some buildings are in poor condition and,
although quite old, have lost much of their historic integrity. In general, the narrow streets are crowded
with parked cars. The sub-area includes
a number of historically and architecturally distinctive buildings including
Federal and Greek Revival-style houses, a former gas works, and an early hall used
as an academy, as well as the homes of two local industrialists, Lysander
Button and William Humphreys. Most of
the architecturally distinguished buildings are located closest to Broad Street
away from the waterfront.
With
funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Canal
Corridor Initiative, many waterfront improvements are taking place in this
sub-area. These include construction of
the Waterford Welcome Center at the foot of the alley between Second and Third
Streets; the installation of a concrete bulkhead, pedestrian walkway and floating
docks along the Erie Canal waterfront; improvements to the existing New York
State Boat Launch; and the creation of several pocket parks at street
ends. Complemented by parking and
streetscape improvements along Broad Street, these projects are designed to
make Waterford a more attractive destination for tourism.
Opportunities
·
Substantial improvements have been made
to the waterfront in this sub-area in the last five years; future waterfront
development will most likely include additional enhancements, neighborhood
improvements and strengthening the linkages between Peebles Island and the
Village (particularly commercial areas).
Constraints
·
Lack of direction regarding vehicular
and pedestrian access to the waterfront area from Broad Street is a major
constraint to visitation and public use.
·
Investment by property owners in this
sub-area is discouraged by frequent flooding.
Some of the housing stock is in fair to poor condition.
The Town of Waterford Zoning Ordinance
was first adopted in 1966 and was most recently updated in February 1998. The Town’s most current zoning map was last
revised in May 1979 with a note that the last amendment was in 1985.
Zoning
is supposed to be implemented and enforced in accordance with a comprehensive
plan. Although the Town has such a plan, it dates to the 1960s and is therefore
in the process of being updated. The
Zoning Board of Appeals has the power to interpret a decision made by the
Building Inspector, grant variances on appeals, granting special permits
Building
permits are required for the construction, movement, external alteration,
extension and addition of all buildings.
The application is filed with the Building Inspector, who is the Town Board’s
designated person to inspect buildings and issue permits.
The
Town of Waterford contains nine classification districts (see Map 3):
·
R-75 Residence
District
·
R-100 Residence
District
·
R-Rural Residential
District
·
C-1 Commercial
District
·
C-2 Commercial
District
·
C-3 Commercial
District
·
M-1 Manufacturing
District
·
M-2 Industrial
District
·
L-C Land
Conservation District
It
should be noted that although the zoning ordinance includes these nine
districts, only seven use districts are shown on the Town’s most current zoning
map, which was revised in May 1979. This
same map includes a list of amendments, with the latest amendment occurring in
1985. The R-Rural residential district
and the C-3 commercial district apparently postdate the zoning map. Neither the current zoning ordinance nor the
current zoning map shows the boundaries of these districts.
Residential Districts
Residence
District (R-75): There are no
separate use regulations for the R-75 district.
Uses are regulated under general district use regulations articulated in
Article II, Section 161-11, with further provisions in Articles III and V. Permitted uses include farms; one-family
dwellings; churches or other places of worship; dentist and other professional
offices; public or private accredited schools; public parks, playgrounds and
outdoor recreation areas; federal, state or municipal public buildings or uses;
home occupations; antique sales where accessory to a residence; identification
signs or nameplates regulated in Article V; and accessory uses or structures.
Special
permit uses in the R-75 district include two-family dwellings; multifamily
dwellings; public utility buildings or uses; convalescent or nursing homes;
nursery schools; physicians or surgeon’s offices; funeral homes; and cider
plants, cold storage or agricultural processing plants not incidental to
permitted principal uses. Prohibited
uses include custody of poultry or livestock, except common pets.
The
minimum lot size requirement for the R-75 district is 11,250 square feet for a
single family home and for non-residential uses, and 10,000 square foot base
plus an additional 10,000 square feet per dwelling unit for two-family and
multi-family structures. There are
non-residential exceptions: farms, which have a minimum lot size of 5 acres,
and churches and convents, which have minimum lot sizes of 40,000 square
feet. The setback specifications are a
minimum of 40 feet for single family homes and non-residential uses, and 50 feet
for two and multi-family homes. The height
of buildings is restricted to 50 feet for all uses in this district. Additional supplemental regulations are
outlined in Article V that pertain to specific structure and lot size
situations.
These
use regulations form a basis for regulation of all residential uses. Residential use districts are also subject to
regulations set forth in Article III (Area, Height and Bulk Requirements) and
Article V (Supplementary Regulations).
Each of the other residential districts has additional specific regulations
as follows:
Residential
District (R-100): District use
regulations for the R-100 districts are delineated in Article II, Section
161-12 and reflect amendments made in 1984.
Permitted uses are the same as those listed under R-75 above. Special permits are required for private
recreation areas or use of land involving archery target practice; pitch and
putt areas; mobile home parks; and individual mobile homes.
The minimum lot size requirement for the R-100 district is 15,000 square